The Rosie Project

Comedy · Romance

The Rosie Project

Editorial direction by Founder, Recommended Audiobooks

7 hours and 32 minutesRuntimeUnabridged audiobookFormatOctober 1, 2013Release dateNarrated editionNarration

Affiliate link · We may earn a commission.

Recommendation DNA i

Established Profile

Narrative and listener evidence are still growing.

Story QualityPlot, structure, and storytelling.
75% Strong
OriginalityFreshness and uniqueness.
81% Strong
Story PacingHow quickly the listening experience moves.
82% Fast
Emotional ImpactHow strongly it affects listeners.
77% High
Humor
76% High
Listener Profile MatchAlignment with your preferences.
31% Low
Emotional ResonanceLasting impression on listeners.
67% Moderate
As we learn more about this audiobook and its listeners, its Recommendation DNA profile can become even more complete. Trait bars describe characteristics such as complexity, romance, pace, and accessibility. The numerical score reflects overall recommendation quality based on multiple sources of evidence.
What it’s about

Don Tillman is a thirty-nine-year-old genetics professor who approaches life with the same orderly, evidence-based logic he brings to his work. Having never made it to a second date, he decides to solve his romantic problem scientifically by creating the Wife Project: a sixteen-page survey designed to identify the perfect partner and eliminate candidates who drink, smoke, or arrive late. Then he meets Rosie Jarman, a fiercely independent barmaid who appears to be the world’s most incompatible woman according to Don’s carefully constructed criteria. Although he quickly rules her out as a candidate for the project, he becomes intrigued by her own search: Rosie wants to discover the identity of her biological father.

When the pair begin working together, their investigation brings them into an increasingly unlikely relationship. As Don tries to apply logic and measurable standards to love, Rosie’s quest challenges the assumptions behind his carefully controlled plan. Their partnership raises an irresistible question: can a perfect match really be found through science, or are the most important parts of a relationship impossible to calculate?

Evidence Confidence

Why this matters →
DevelopingAudiobook-specific confidence
  • The book itself is well identified and supported across independent sources.
  • We still have limited information tied to this exact recording or edition.
  • We have recording-specific performance commentary or analyzed audio for this audiobook.

We have a useful picture of the audiobook, though some listening and edition-specific details are still becoming clearer.

Evidence Snapshot i

These cards measure different things in the same evidence pool, so they are not meant to add together. Retained Evidence counts unique saved records; discussions and networks count independent groups; narration and edition cards count only records qualified for those specific jobs.

View all evidence sources
159Retained Evidence
Unique evidence records after filtering and deduplication
Supporting sources 15
What this means

Unique evidence records that remain after filtering and deduplication. The larger evidence-signal total shown below can be higher because one retained record may support several separate facts or observations.

56Discussions
Unique review, forum and conversation groups
Source groups 5
What this means

Separate reviews, forums, interviews, or conversations, with duplicates kept from inflating the total.

30Source Networks
Unique source families, communities and publications
Networks 30
What this means

Different platforms and publications represented in the research behind this page.

7Narration Evidence
Usable voice or performance evidence for this recording
Supporting sources 2
What this means

Performance evidence that can actually describe how this narrator sounds or performs this recording. Identity records, narrator biographies, sample links, and awards are useful context but do not count here on their own.

4Edition Sources
Recording-specific identity and edition checks
Supporting sources 4
What this means

Sources tied to the audiobook recording itself, such as verified product or catalog records that help resolve narrator, runtime, format, release information, or stable recording identifiers.

September 21, 2026Last Updated
This page is refreshed as new information arrives
What this means

The most recent date this page’s saved evidence picture was refreshed and checked.

A larger evidence pool gives us more to work with, but volume alone does not make a conclusion stronger. Relevance and independence still matter.

What the Evidence Adds

Useful context the synopsis doesn’t cover — patterns that may help you decide whether this book is your kind of read or listen.

Strong book evidence

Emotional Impact

Emotional stakes are a noticeable part of the book, rather than the story operating only at the level of plot or ideas.

Humor

Humor is a meaningful part of the book’s personality and helps shape how the story lands.

Emotional Resonance

Emotional stakes are a noticeable part of the book, rather than the story operating only at the level of plot or ideas.

Built from 159 retained source records across 22 independent discussions and 14 source networks.

Awards & Recognition

What counts here
This is the complete verified recognition ledger for the book/work, selected audiobook or production, author, narrator, and series. Scope is labeled so a narrator or author career honor is never mistaken for an award won by this specific audiobook. Official award art is shown only when the verified source itself provides an eligible image; otherwise a neutral award marker is used.
ALA / YALSA 2018 — HonorBook / work · Institutional Book…Verified award record →

Narrator Experience

How Dan O'Grady performs this particular recording.

How we build this section
Performance descriptions use evidence tied to this recording. Repeated independent observations carry more weight than isolated comments. Narrator background and awards add context but do not determine how this performance is described. Measured sample signals describe only the analyzed excerpt and are never treated as quality scores.

Performance summary

The excerpt is delivered in a controlled, consistent manner with clear articulation, focusing on the narrative without character voices or dialogue.

This description is based on evidence specific to this recording.
Hear official sample

Verified against the exact title, author, and narrator. Opens the Amazon sample page.

Performance at a glance

What the qualified evidence says about this narration

Audio observations reflect a short verified sample and are combined with recording-specific performance evidence.

Narration PaceMeasuredThe narrator maintains a consistent rhythm with slight pauses between sentences, suggesting careful pacing.Developing evidence
Clarity / EnunciationClearWords are enunciated distinctly and each syllable is easily understood.Developing evidence
Character voicesDistinctThe evidence describes character shifts as distinct enough to help listeners keep speakers separated.Developing evidence
ExpressivenessRestrainedThe tone remains even with limited variation in pitch or emphasis, indicating controlled expression.Developing evidence

What this means for your listen

Early performance evidence points this way: the steady or measured pace should feel easy to settle into; listeners who prefer brisk delivery may find it more deliberate. Clear or careful diction should make dialogue, names, and unfamiliar terms easier to follow over a longer listen.

Explore the full narration analysis

Evidence behind this section

Counts describe support for this narrator/recording, not a quality score.
7Narration evidence records
2Independent performance sources
11Additional narrator/context records

Why we describe the performance this way

We use evidence tied specifically to this recording. Repeated observations across independent sources carry more weight than isolated comments. Narrator background and career recognition can add useful context, but they do not determine how this performance is described.

Supporting narrator & context sources5 source groups · 18 linked records
View source groups 5 groups · 18 records

What the Story Feels Like

How this works
These signals describe the story’s tone, pacing, complexity, and emotional character. They do not claim to describe an unverified recording.
Humor
Witty and comic
What this means

This is a recurring reader-facing quality in the evidence and is most useful when considered alongside the other supported traits.

Why it appears: Book information and independent reader or listener observations that speak directly to this trait; recording-specific claims are kept separate unless they are actually supported.

Pace
Brisk
What this means

The story tends to keep moving, with enough forward momentum to make scene changes and plot turns feel relatively quick.

Why it appears: Book information and independent reader or listener observations that speak directly to this trait; recording-specific claims are kept separate unless they are actually supported.

Emotional Impact
Strong
What this means

Emotion plays a meaningful role in the experience, so character relationships and outcomes are likely to matter beyond the plot mechanics.

Why it appears: Book information and independent reader or listener observations that speak directly to this trait; recording-specific claims are kept separate unless they are actually supported.

What this means for you: The story-level experience is likely to feel playful and distinctive, with much of its comedy coming from Don’s literal, highly ordered way of interpreting ordinary social situations. Its emotional appeal grows from the contrast between his desire to control relationships and the warmth that emerges when human connection resists calculation.

Built from the book and story evidence that speaks directly to these traits; it does not describe an unverified recording.

Reader Themes

How themes are identified
Themes appear when independent discussions repeat a meaningful idea about the story or listening experience. Counts reflect distinct discussions rather than repeated copies of the same source.
Humor & banter14 networks
Engaging Story8 discussions
Emotional Warmth3 discussions
Fast-Moving Story2 discussions

Public response is strongly favorable toward the book’s humor and distinctive premise, with additional agreement that it is engaging, emotionally warm, and relatively fast-moving. A smaller dissenting response raises concerns about dated or uncomfortable gender-related material and suggests that the novel may take some readers time to settle into.

Evidence sources for these themes

Based on themes repeated across 56 independent discussions and 30 source networks.

Where Readers Agree

The strongest agreement centers on humor and originality. The leading theme appears across 22 independent discussions and 14 source networks, which makes it more than a one-off reaction. Emotional impact and fast-moving story also recur, adding useful secondary context to why the book works for people who respond to it. Story quality appears less often, so it reads more like a supporting note than the main point of agreement.

The strongest theme is independently supported across 22 discussions and 14 source networks.

Evidence sources for agreement

Is This Right for You?

Story and reader-fit guidance remains useful here. Recording-specific claims are limited to evidence matched to this exact edition.

You’ll probably enjoy this if…

  • You enjoy romantic comedies with unconventional protagonists.
  • You like witty social observation and comic misunderstandings.
  • You want a warm story that mixes laughter with emotional growth.
  • You are interested in relationships that challenge rigid ideas about compatibility.

It might not be the best fit if…

  • You prefer conventional romance protagonists and familiar relationship dynamics.
  • You dislike awkward humor built around social misinterpretation.
  • You want a heavily documented audiobook performance or pronounced character-voice work.
  • You are sensitive to dated gender attitudes or infidelity-related material.
  • If narration style is important to you, use the verified sample above alongside the edition-matched performance evidence.

Our Take

The Rosie Project stands out for the originality of its premise and the comic force of Don Tillman’s tightly ordered worldview. Public response is especially enthusiastic about the humor, while also finding room for emotional warmth and a satisfying romantic dimension. It should suit readers who enjoy offbeat character studies more than conventional romance, though some may find Don’s social blindness or certain gender-related elements uncomfortable. Story-level reception is much stronger than the available recording-performance evidence.

See what supports this take →

Runtime & Edition Details

Runtime
7 hours and 32 minutes
Format
Unabridged audiobook
Publisher
Simon & Schuster Audio
Audiobook release date
October 1, 2013
Language
English
ASIN
B00DEKLXXQ

Why You Can Trust This Recommendation

  • Identity and edition signals are checked separately
  • Independent discussions and source networks are counted distinctly
  • Narration claims require edition- or narrator-specific support
  • Unsupported information is withheld instead of displayed as a zero score

159 evidence records remain in the research set behind this page after filtering and deduplication.

See contributing sources

Ready to experience The Rosie Project?

Continue to this audiobook’s current verified edition and availability.

View audiobook on Amazon